Advanced Identity Reframing: when emasculation becomes a necessity (part 1)

(by Susanne Liu, M.D., for DreamLover Laboratories)

Today I would like to talk about an advanced Identity Reframing technique. Basic knowledge of IR is required and will be assumed throughout this essay.

Sexual Identity

As you know, Identity Reframing requires direct modification of a male's self-image. One of the most important components of this self-image is a male's sexual identity. Therefore, its systematic attack has long been a subject of discussion within women's rights circles and the male training community.

It is widely believed that every male will experience at least one plateau along his training, and that the majority of plateaus are actually caused by a conflict between desired behavior and a male's sexual identity. A male's sexual identity is actually a very inconvenient thing when you realize that males sometimes misbehave because they feel they must act manly.

Ordinary IR techniques such as "redefining manly", or trying to associate manly to more obedient behaviors, are of course to be tried before attempting something as drastic as what we will discuss here - however, these do not always work because there are cultural stereotypes at play that are very well anchored in a male's psyche. So when "manly" cannot be redefined to mean "obedient", then we are left with only one option: that of revoking his manhood altogether.

Revoking his manhood

By "revoking a male's manhood" we refer to the process of detaching male gender stereotypes from his conception of self. The male must cease to think of himself as "manly", in order to avoid cognitive dissonance from interfering with his training. The male must be led, symbolically and practically, through a "point of no return": he must be made to do things that are undeniable, and yet completely incompatible with manhood and manliness. The process must - of course - be gradual, in order to minimize resistance.

Only two methods have been discovered so far that completely and unequivocally negate manhood: long-term chastity and sodomy.

Short vs long-term chastity

Although most believe that long-term chastity is simply an extension of a regular, short-term chastity regime this is very far from reality. Let's examine both:

Short-term chastity simply increases seminal fluid volume in a male's testicles, seminal vesicles and sperm ducts, and by doing so greatly increases the male's sexual desire. Then, when the urge becomes overwhelming, a skilled trainer can exploit her feminine charms to extract any promise or required behavior (willful participation). IR techniques take short-term chastity further, by teaching the male to associate his sexual desire to obedience; here the male is actively pursuing servitude as the only allowed sexual outlet.

Long-term chastity has all the benefits of short-term chastity. Being longer it allows greater seminal fluid accumulation and greater sexual leverage. A male in long-term chastity can be recognized by the fact that his penis is constantly dripping (leaking seminal fluid), an inevitable reaction to his sperm vesicles and ducts being completely full. Many women experiment with long-term chastity at least once to enjoy this sight suggestive of a "drooling" male, unable to contain his lust and yet completely powerless to satisfy it.

But long-term chastity also has an important psychological effect: it negates and denies basic male functionality. The male's penis (the symbol of his manhood) is relegated to a locked and forgotten, unreachable place, without a concrete prospect of becoming erect again. Therefore, long-term chastity is more akin to castration.

Sodomy

It is an accepted fact that a male who has been made to endure another will see his sense of manhood shattered, and quickly create a new, more docile self-image. Heterosexual, homophobic males are especially prone to harboring strong sexual identities, and particularly vulnerable to this type of treatment. While this concept is very easy to grasp, in practice it is difficult to apply, requiring many intermediate steps in order to ensure that the change is gradual and that the male remains compliant throughout the progress.

Forced vs voluntary

Advocates of "Forced Subjugation" male training techniques will oppose the leniency of the gradual approach we propose; indeed many great husbands have been broken by sodomy in record time under a Forced Subjugation regimen. However, the time savings achieved by this method are more than offset by the frequent mental trauma suffered by these males. For this reason, Compulsory Sodomy (CS) as a means of behavior alteration should be a technique of last-resort, likely only useful to a trained professional who is given a very short time to produce a fully functional male.

Additionally, I believe that sexual identity reframing can greatly benefit from a male's willful compliance in his therapy. A male who offers himself for sodomy voluntarily (Voluntary Sodomy, or VS) will develop a much more submissive new sexual identity than one who has been forced through the process. This is because the need for consistency will ensure that as he internalizes the loss of his manhood, he will also incorporate coherent interpretations about his willful compliance. The male will often form beliefs such as "at a subconscious level, this must be what I wanted"; or, "I actually enjoyed it, otherwise I would not have seen it through". Due to this common psychological reaction, the male ends up strongly believing that a latent desire existed, and that he alone was responsible for the loss of his manhood - leading to a very stable new sexual identity from which notions of masculinity are conspicuously absent.