So I've looked at the product and it seems a great amount of effort has been put into It,but I have to ask what kind of women would actually be interested in this? I've met a dominant women before but I've never met anyone who would want this level control over someone else.
With kind regards, I'd like to refer you to a familiar story.
A man is arguing on an almost daily basis with the woman of his heart, so much so that nary a week or a month goes by without old tempers flairing up, and both are stuck in a constant reminder of the problems that each of them face, for one reason or another. The woman has heard the complaints of the man, many times, and the man feels that his complaint hasn't even been addressed, let alone heard. AND -- I capitalize my letters for emphasis here -- AND SO IT CONTINUES. They have forgotten how to appreciate each other, not only emotionally but -- and this is the key thing here -- spiritually, too.
This DreamLover 2000 system is designed, in short, to call time on the frustrations of the relationship. It allows both parties to effectively bring an abrupt halt to the current train of thought for the male, to assure him that he is not alone in his frustrations.
Furthermore, there are many males actively seeking out a way to encourage additional communication in their relationship, but don't know how. This facilitates that, and more, in many ways.
The "male management system" is a male training apparatus designed to facilitate short, automated pulses of electricity to be sent to the male's genitalia. This can range from gentle (to remind him he is in her thoughts) , or painful (to remind him of a chore that he frequently forgets to complete).
With the above outline, this system can be fully customized by her (and him, if she allows), so that they can both continue to have a strong, loving, nurturing relationship.
All of the above text is from my own hand -> None of it has been copied from one source and pasted to another, although I did do my research thoroughly before replying.
If I have helped you understand this system better, I thank you for reading. If you still don't understand, perhaps it's not for you at this moment in time. I hope, mayhaps, that it will be, after some reflection.
So I've looked at the product and it seems a great amount of effort has been put into It,but I have to ask what kind of women would actually be interested in this? I've met a dominant women before but I've never met anyone who would want this level control over someone else.
With kind regards, I'd like to refer you to a familiar story.
A man is arguing on an almost daily basis with the woman of his heart, so much so that nary a week or a month goes by without old tempers flairing up, and both are stuck in a constant reminder of the problems that each of them face, for one reason or another. The woman has heard the complaints of the man, many times, and the man feels that his complaint hasn't even been addressed, let alone heard. AND -- I capitalize my letters for emphasis here -- AND SO IT CONTINUES. They have forgotten how to appreciate each other, not only emotionally but -- and this is the key thing here -- spiritually, too.
This DreamLover 2000 system is designed, in short, to call time on the frustrations of the relationship. It allows both parties to effectively bring an abrupt halt to the current train of thought for the male, to assure him that he is not alone in his frustrations.
Furthermore, there are many males actively seeking out a way to encourage additional communication in their relationship, but don't know how. This facilitates that, and more, in many ways.
The "male management system" is a male training apparatus designed to facilitate short, automated pulses of electricity to be sent to the male's genitalia. This can range from gentle (to remind him he is in her thoughts) , or painful (to remind him of a chore that he frequently forgets to complete).
With the above outline, this system can be fully customized by her (and him, if she allows), so that they can both continue to have a strong, loving, nurturing relationship.
All of the above text is from my own hand -> None of it has been copied from one source and pasted to another, although I did do my research thoroughly before replying.
If I have helped you understand this system better, I thank you for reading. If you still don't understand, perhaps it's not for you at this moment in time. I hope, mayhaps, that it will be, after some reflection.
Kind regards,
Ms. O.