Male training

As a fantasy what she says is fine, but as reality, and from a doctor I thought it went much too far too when I read it months ago. As I remember she goes even further, or maybe I'm thinking of someone else on this site, anyway someone says a woman should get a man in to sodomise the controlled male as if being submissive automatically makes you gay. It doesn't.

For me, I like to dress as a maid and serve my Mistress who I love but I do not expect to be loved, I hope for it of course. She does look after me while I am being submissive to her. In my situation I accept that she probably has sex elsewhere and loves the man she sleeps with but in your situation things would be very different. If you love each other then being cuckolded like that would destroy the love, probably on both sides and then there is nothing but dominance and submission and that is beyond the very basic 'rules' on which YOUR relationship is based. Yours is based on two way love and is like a business contract, that is the essence of the contract, break that and you would have every right to break off the relationship.

In past centuries the male female balance of power was wrong, and devices like the DL2000 tip the balance the other way for those who choose to use it but a small amount of the ideas on this web site go too far and effectively condone rape by a third party. Being mentally forced into having sex is no more acceptable than being physically forced into it. It is morally wrong and probably illegal and for a doctor to be advocating I think is deplorable.

We all have our own different limits of what we find acceptable. I fantasise that my Mistress might enslave me, though of course if she did she would be breaking the law. The DL2000 is designed for consensual use, I would like it if my Mistress used one on me and I very nearly bought one but have hung back because of the claims of neuroplasticity. I have a career and do not want my brain modified. In a few years when I retire then maybe. The male sexual desire has long been used by females to 'wrap him around their little finger' and this probably does involve modifying the brain to a degree, just as some males have manipulated the minds of some females. In a marriage both parties have their behaviour modified for the common good of the whole family, and it makes little difference which of the couple is dominant but to go as far as had been suggested and bring other people in is not for the common good. I think it is selfish and evil.

I know my thoughts are incomplete but I have probably written too much already.

I have been amazed by that website and the articles of male training till I hit the advanced identity reframing part4 about voluntary sodomy!! This lady who calls herself Sussane is a wacko to think this will work for the benefit of a real heterosexual relationship, I admire everything she said up till this point, this is way behind the line of normal! What's the next thing: cuckolding!! I mean it's ok for whoever is bi or into cuckolding but common for normal Real MEN who are pure heterosexual that's a fuckin red line, I wonder if she thought about the consequences of such thing afterwards, I mean probably it can happen and u get fucked in the ass for her by a guy, but that will certainly change who u are , and for Christ sake, cum only from anal, and u expect that guy wouldn't consider homosexuality afterwards. Don't mistaken me here, I have taken it up the ass but by Dominant women, I,m still a man, and I am proud of my manhood serving my loving female partner in anyways that doesn't mess up who I am and change something totally representing my identity, such act like that is definitely not in the realm of being a submissive MAN, it turns u into something else TOTALLY outside the realm of FLR or female supremacy, how is it even a female led relationship when u r no longer a man in ur own eyes, and in everyone else's
This is fuckin wacko and disgusting, it will evoke all kinds of wife beating/ domestic violence urgencies in any heterosexual man instead of fuckin identity reframing u stupid peace of bullpooo MD not-so male management expert!
Good luck with that , and say hello to ur fellow submissive cuckolds

i firmly believe that the Woman in the relationship should be able to have other lovers if She so chooses, especially if Her husband or boyfriend cannot satisfy Her. It is the man's priority to be faithful to his wife or girlfriend at all times and even assist his Partner to get ready for her dates and to help clean up after Her date is over in all ways

I agree with both of the previous comments. To coerce or 'brainwash' a man into accepting first that his wife/girlfriend takes on lovers, and second that he will have to 'demonstrate' his love by submitting to anal sex with another man is just going too far, and shows a marked lack of respect.

Of course if the two both discuss without coercion on either side and both agree that they want it - well then that is different, but either should be able to opt out at any time, including at the very last second. Just as with a traditional male female date, when the girl says no, the man should stop, if he doesn't he should face the full force of the law. That for thousands of years it hasn't been fair is no excuse to make it unfair the other direction.

I guess I got a little wordy but my point is that everyone should agree beforehand and either should be able to stop the 'program' at any time.

Little boys, women want to do what they please.
Why am I spending my time reading this?
Are you such complete virgins to the ways of matriarchial women?
I don't understand your mindless ragings.

You really should not have been so negative, Mika Sasaki's blog is totally commonplace, and now you mostly look like dramaqueens.

Yes this is not for everybody, but if you dislike dominant females, please step away from the shoreline sir.